Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Prioritize using default templates from card over task #1596

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Feb 13, 2025

Conversation

elronbandel
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@elronbandel elronbandel requested a review from yoavkatz February 11, 2025 14:55
return self.card is not None and self.card.templates is not None and len(self.card.templates) > 0

@property
def has_no_templates(self):
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe 'user_specified_expicit_template' is a better name (of the negated option)

"references_field": "answers",
"__description__": "lmms-evals default template for infovqa."
},
"templates": [
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe add this as a "template.qa.single_word_answer?"

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The whole point of it being that it is curated for this card specifically

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's pretty generic instruction - but not critical.

@elronbandel elronbandel enabled auto-merge (squash) February 12, 2025 12:25
@elronbandel elronbandel merged commit 8472838 into main Feb 13, 2025
17 of 18 checks passed
@elronbandel elronbandel deleted the default-template-policy branch February 13, 2025 11:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants